on marrige blogwriting 8

this week we have been talk about quite a lot on marrige, a perplexity long haunting in the sociology. as usual, i haven't talk much,partly because of my idiosyncracy,partly of the traditionally unacceptible attitude toward the issue i know.

though the fundamental definitions of sociologiacl subjects are seldom to reach a consensus,i prefer a sociologist's view that marrige is more of a technique to fulfil the instinctive sexual disire most economically and axe living expenditure.this aberrant assertion, i kown will never be acceped by the majority and even annoy them and actually invents vetuperations,since it unfairly ignores the emotion factors. sociology is just a field where no consensus can be reached, even a compromise one,as the known factors and unpredictable and underlying variables is enormorse.for these field,the western methodology of logical anaylsis and empiricalism,which is somewhat a universal blind faith, is not suitable and reasonable.we may find another approach,say macrosynthesis. whether any research of marrige is doomed to no avail i know not,but as we type in and put out english words on computers without a strand of kownledge the how the artificial language is transformed into machine language and then represented,i kown that not kowning marrige well will not be a impediment of our marriges.